The legend of Atlantis in ancient Greece. Atlantis: legend, history and interesting facts

History of Atlantis: myths, conjectures, riddles and real facts

More than one generation of researchers has been arguing about the existence of Atlantis, a mighty ancient state that once and for all disappeared from the face of the Earth. Interest in this topic arose after the works of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato saw the light. It was Plato who first wrote about Atlantis, described the ancient civilization, the strength and power of the Atlanteans. Whether it was a deliberately and skillfully created myth, or we are dealing with a description of the real facts of the ancient history of human civilization - remains a mystery. Neither before nor after it was possible to obtain and find evidence of the existence of the Atlantean state. The secrets of Atlantis remain unsolved until now, forcing historians to put forward new hypotheses, and researchers to look for the place of the disappeared island-state on the planet's map.

The civilization of Atlantis is a source of controversy

Today, a huge number of works have been written about the disappeared mighty civilization of the ancient world, starting with poetic essays and literary descriptions, ending with serious scientific treatises. In each individual case, you have to deal with a huge set of assumptions and hypotheses that the ancient world looked different than today's map of the world looks like. Another new hypothesis gives rise to a new myth, which instantly acquires new details, assumptions and details. Another thing is the complete absence of facts capable of answering the question: did Atlantis exist in reality or not. This meager research material remains the lot of science fiction writers and atlantologists. Skeptics believe that the history of Atlantis is an artificially created phenomenon in modern historical science.

It is necessary to consider the problem of Atlantis in two aspects: from the point of view of the historical epic, and using a scientific approach. In the first case, one has to deal with the evidence base and materials, the existence of which is never disputed by anyone. The palm in this area belongs to the works of Plato. The ancient Greek philosopher mentioned the mighty state of antiquity in the dialogues Critias and Timaeus, which were compiled on the basis of the diaries of another prominent ancient Greek philosopher Solon, who was Plato's great-grandfather. With the light hand of Plato, the name of the ancient state appeared, and its inhabitants began to be called Atlanteans.

In his notes and books, the ancient philosopher relied on a legend according to which the ancient Greeks fought against the state of the Atlanteans. The confrontation ended with a grandiose cataclysm that led to the death of Atlantis. According to the ancients, it was this catastrophe that led to the fact that the city-island of Atlantis disappeared forever from the face of the planet. What catastrophe on a planetary scale has led to such consequences is still not known and has not been proven. Another question is that in the scientific community at the moment there is a point of view that 12 thousand years BC. the world really suffered a major catastrophe that changed the geography of the planet.

Plato's dialogue "Timaeus" quite accurately indicates the location of the country of the Atlantes, is full of descriptions of the details of the culture and life of the Atlanteans. Thanks to the efforts of the ancient Greek philosopher, the lost civilization is being persistently searched for in the Atlantic Ocean. Just one phrase "opposite the Pillars of Hercules", recorded by Plato, indicates the location of the legendary country. There are no more accurate data on the location of the mysterious ancient state, so many researchers on this topic believe that Atlantis could be located in any other part of the ancient world.

The inconsistency of many of the facts set forth in the works of Plato raised a number of questions for subsequent generations. The main secrets of Atlantis are as follows:

whether there is a high probability of the existence of an island of such a large size, traces of which are almost completely absent today;
what catastrophe that occurred in antiquity could lead to the instant death of a large state;
could there have existed in such ancient times a civilization with such a high level of development, which is attributed to the Atlanteans by ancient and modern researchers;
why today there are no real traces from the past, indicating the existence of Atlantis;
whether we are descendants of a highly developed culture of the Atlanteans.

How did the contemporaries of the ancient Greeks see Atlantis

Studying Plato's works, one can briefly summarize the information that has come down to us. We are dealing with the history of the existence and mystical disappearance of a large archipelago or a large island, which was located in the west of the then ancient world. The central city of the superpower was Atlantis, which owes its name to the first king of the state of Atlantis. The island location explains the state structure of the empire. Probably Atlantis, like many cities of ancient Greece, was a union of island rulers united under imperial rule. Perhaps there was a different political system in Atlantis, but Plato's dialogues give the names of kings, after whom other islands of the empire are named. Hence, ancient civilization took the form of a union or confederation.

Another question lies in Plato's detailed description of the life order of the mysterious power. All the main buildings and structures of the state are located on the central island. The acropolis, royal palace and temples are protected by several rows of earthen ramparts and a system of water channels. The inner regions of the island are connected to the sea by a huge shipping channel, so we can safely say that the power of Atlantis was focused on achieving sea power. Moreover, according to Plato, the Atlanteans worship Poseidon (the ancient Greek god, the ruler of the seas and oceans - the brother of Zeus). In Plato, the temples of the Atlanteans, their architecture and home improvement shine with luxury and wealth. Reaching the shores of Atlantis, surrounded on all sides by water, and the path to the island lay only by sea, was not an easy task for sailors of that time.

Plato in his narratives is very fond of describing the improvement of the capital of the Atlanteans. The most interesting thing in this aspect is that the descriptions of the ancient Greek philosopher strongly resemble the descriptions of other ancient Greek cities found in other ancient sources. The described infrastructure, weapons, ships, religion and lifestyle of the inhabitants of Atlantis look like the height of human perfection and a model of well-being.

The mystery of Atlantis in Plato's descriptions is present at every turn. Is it not surprising that people live far from the centers of civilization known to the then world, but they have a fairly high level of development, they can make long sea voyages, trade with everyone around, eat spices and other cultures. The Atlanteans have a powerful army and a numerous fleet capable of confronting the armies of the ancient states of the Mediterranean.

This should be the point. Only Plato was able to describe the life and structure of the legendary state in such a clear and detailed way. To find other sources that would point to such facts was not, is not, and probably will not be. Neither the Sumerians nor the ancient Egyptians say anything about a large state in the Western Hemisphere. The ancient ruins of the Indian civilizations of North and South America are silent about interaction with the mysterious and powerful state. How many years ago could such a powerful civilization be located in the central Atlantic, about which there is still no real evidence.

Secrets of Atlantis: myths and legends against real facts

Some researchers continue to feed the world with illusions that Atlantis really was. Following the lead of Plato, who indicated the exact location of the island, researchers in search of Atlantis check the territory in the Azores, in the Bahamas. This is facilitated by the consonance of the names of the Atlantic Ocean and the legendary island.

According to one version, Atlantis was located in the Azores. Studies of the seamount Ampere, located on the way from Europe to America, and the adjacent areas of the Atlantic mid-ridge did not give any results. The geological and morphological structure of the seabed does not give grounds to believe that a large geological formation existed in this area of the earth's crust in ancient times. Even a gigantic cataclysm that wiped out such a large island or archipelago from the face of the earth would have left behind indisputable evidence. If the island sank as a result of a successive chain of earthquakes and floods, then its remains could be found today.

Modern scientists do not have data on a major geological and tectonic catastrophe that befell the earth in antiquity. The biblical data about the global flood that befell the Earth and mankind take us to a completely different era. All information, events and facts that speak in favor of the existence of Atlantis in this part of the globe do not stand up to criticism, if you rely on the theory proposed by Plato.

Supporters of another hypothesis, the Mediterranean one, have stronger evidence in their favor. However, there are also a number of points that cause controversy. What were the real boundaries of such a powerful union, and where could such a large island or a small mainland be located. The western border of the world known to people of that time lies along the Pillars of Hercules - now the Strait of Gibraltar, connecting the Mediterranean Sea with the Atlantic. Why, with such eventfulness and tightness, the ancient world did not have cartographic data on the location of a large state that influences the political and economic structure of the world. On the maps compiled by the ancient Greeks, Phoenicians and Egyptians, which have come down to our times, the known areas are limited to the Mediterranean region, the territories of Southern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa.

Many atlantologists increasingly agree that a civilization of this size could exist in the Eastern Mediterranean, in the explored sphere of political and economic interests of ancient states. The disappearance of the island and the death of the country of the Atlanteans can be tied to the catastrophic eruption of the Santorin volcano, which erupted around the 17th century BC. This hypothesis takes place, since it is during this period that the heyday of the Cretan state falls. According to this theory, the volcanic eruption not only destroyed half of the island of Thera, but also destroyed the numerous city-states that existed in this region. If we put aside the question of names and the link to Plato's statements about the Pillars of Hercules, such a picture of the ancient world has the right to life.

In this context, the version about the existence in ancient times of a powerful state that competes with the ancient Greek cities-policies coexists perfectly. The facts of the strongest cataclysm of that time were also noted in ancient sources. Today, volcanologists and oceanologists reasonably consider this version of the death of Atlantis to be quite real. Scientists have found evidence that the Minoan civilization really had a huge military power and had a high level of development, allowing it to wage confrontation with the Greek states.

Sparta and Athens are located 300-400 kilometers north of the islands of Thira and Crete, which are ideal for the location of the Atlantean state. The explosion of the volcano, which destroyed a mighty state in one night, destroyed the balance in the world that existed until that moment. The consequences of such a large-scale disaster affected the entire southern Europe, North Africa and the coast of the Middle East.

Versions in favor of another location of the legendary power today have no basis. Researchers are increasingly linking the existence of Atlantis with Plato's philosophical view of the existing world. This is echoed by other sources in which the land of the Atlanteans is associated with other mythical territories and states that existed in the imagination of the ancient Greeks.

Hyperborea and Atlantis - ancient mythical states

When asked where to look for Atlantis today, the answer may sound prosaic. You have to search everywhere. Relying on ancient sources is possible only in those cases when the question is raised about the cultural heritage that has come down to our times. In the sense in which we perceive Atlantis today as an imaginary country and highly developed civilization, the ancient Greeks at one time represented Hyperborea. This mythical country, located in the far north, a thousand kilometers from the coast of Ancient Greece, was considered by the Greeks as the habitat of the Hyperboreans, the descendants of the gods. Is this not the Atlantis that Plato wanted to tell the world about when writing his treatises?

Hyperborean lands, according to modern scientists, should have been located on the territory of the current Scandinavian countries: in Iceland or in Greenland. The Greeks directly pointed out that even Apollo himself, the god of the sun, was considered the patron of this people. What are these lands, do they really exist? It was assumed that Hyperborea is a fictional country for the ancient Greeks, where perfect and powerful people live, the gods rest. The country that Apollo regularly visits may be the same Atlantis - the state that the ancient Greeks aspired to in their development.

Stories about the mysterious disappearance of ships and planes in the Bermuda Triangle, supported by the legends of the sunken Atlantis, still excite the minds of many people today. The fate of our highly civilized predecessors, whose existence has not yet been proven, according to Charles Berlitz, has become the reason for writing more than twenty-five thousand books and articles. Atlantologists to this day argue about whether Atlantis existed. Many of them believe that she was not in the Atlantic Ocean and not even on Earth. Others rely on the meager information that has come down to us from the depths of centuries.

Most theories about the existence of Atlantis are based on biblical legends and the works of the ancient Greek philosopher Plato. In his dialogues Timaeus and Critias, he refers to the impressions of the Athenian legislator Solon, who visited the ancient Egyptian city of Sais. During a meeting with the Egyptian priests, he was shown the written monuments of Atlantis and told the story of its existence, which he later told to Plato's great-grandfather.

Plato's Dialogues says that “... in Atlantis there was a large and wonderful empire that ruled almost the entire island and several others (islands in the Atlantic Ocean), as well as part of the continent. They owned riches such as kings and lords had never before had, and which they probably never would have.

They lined their temples with silver, and belvederes with gold… The roofs were made of ivory, decorated with gold, silver and origalkum (perhaps an alloy of bronze). Everything around was densely populated, the canals and the largest ports were full of ships and traders sailing from all over the world ... In addition, there were many elephants on the island.

According to Plato, the end of the beautiful empire came suddenly: "... After that, terrible earthquakes and floods appeared, in one single day and night of rains ... the island of Atlantis disappeared and sank into the sea ..."

Where was Atlantis and when did it disappear? Plato writes: “... in these days (9000 years before Plato), i.e. 11500 years ago, ships sailed in the Atlantic Ocean because there was an island located opposite the strait, which you call the Pillars of Hercules. The island was larger than Libya (North Africa) and Asia (Asia Minor) put together, and served as a path to other islands, and from the islands it was possible to cross the entire opposite continent, which surrounded the real ocean, since that sea that is between the Strait of Hercules ( Mediterranean Sea) - only a bay with a narrow passage, but that, the other - a real sea and the land surrounding it can be called a continent with confidence ... ".

It is not clear from the writings of Plato whether some of the inhabitants of Atlantis survived and what their fate is. Does the disappearance of Atlantis have anything to do with the Flood, or perhaps the biblical legends of Noah's Ark, the stories of the Mahabharata and the Babylonian traditions are different versions of stories about the same cataclysm? And if we ask this question on the pages of our book, it is because modern interpreters of the problems of Atlantis connect the "mysterious" disappearance of ships and aircraft in the Bermuda Triangle with the return of the descendants of the mythical Atlanteans to their native places.

But let's go back to the geological history of our planet. Is it possible that the cases described by ancient legends, myths, biblical traditions and Plato were real? Is it possible that an ancient continent existed in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean? These questions also affect the history of the formation of the oceans.

Modern geophysical research makes it possible to detect significant differences in the structure of the earth's crust of continents and oceans. Using seismic methods, geophysics proved that the thickness of the continental type of the earth's crust is about 30–40 km under high mountain ranges. And the thickness of the earth's crust of the oceanic type is only 5-15 km. The boundary between the two types of the earth's crust passes near the 2000 m isobath, where some significant differences also arise in their structure.

These data confirm the initial assumptions that the coastal areas of the sea were once vast plains. Sound ranging, a powerful tool for measuring the depth of the sea, offers us an excellent opportunity to map the topography of the seabed. Such maps clearly show the mouths and canyons of ancient rivers that have gone under water, the coastline that existed tens of millennia ago, former terraces, as well as other features of modern coastal regions. With such data, today we can reconstruct the position of the ocean surface over a period of tens of thousands of years.

Deviation of the ocean level from the present day in meters. On the abscissa - time in millennia. 1 - according to Fairbridge - 1961; 2 - according to Carrey - 1968

It is generally accepted that in the last 12 thousand years, after the end of the Würm Ice Age, the contours of the continents have not changed significantly. This means that the change in the level of the ocean can be a consequence of its own internal oscillations of the ocean-atmosphere system. As a result of the warming that began 15,000 years ago, the ocean level, which was then 110 m lower than today, began to rise at a rate of 2 cm per year. This increase continued until a period that existed 5–6 millennia ago, after which the rate of increase dropped to 1–2 mm per year.

Similar processes apparently led to the flooding of vast coastal areas and many island systems. But is it possible to refer to them in the case of Atlantis? Obviously not, because Plato believes, and the same follows from other legends, that this happened suddenly, and the speed of climatic processes is extremely low. Then we will have to look for an explanation in the tectonic activity of the Earth.

Today, there are two main theories about the formation of the ocean - the theory of neomobilism (global plate tectonics) and the theory of oceanization of the continental crust. The first theory is based on the hypothesis of the German geophysicist Alfred Wegener about the drift of the continents. Wegener suggested that about 230 million years ago there was only one continent on Earth - Pangea and one ocean - Pantalas. The rotation of the Earth led to the fragmentation of the macrocontinent and the horizontal movement of the continents. As a result, the Atlantic and Indian Oceans were formed.

Assumed configurations of Pangea and Pantalas 200 million years ago.

The location of the continents by the end of the Triassic - 180 million years ago.

One of Wegener's strongest arguments in favor of his proposed mechanism for the formation of continents and oceans was the similarity of coastlines on opposite shores of the Atlantic and other oceans. His theory, however, went through a crisis until the sixties of our century, when it was revived again, this time as the theory of neomobilism. Adherents of this theory argue that the Earth is covered with solid plates that move under the influence of convective movements that occur at a depth of more than a hundred kilometers below the earth's surface. The boundaries between two plates, according to this theory, coincide with seismically active zones, and not with the boundaries between continents and oceans, as Wegener argued.

According to the theory of neomobilism, by the end of the Triassic period (about 180 million years ago), the formation of the basins of the Atlantic and Indian oceans began. The Tethys Sea divided Pangea into two pra-continents - Gondwana and Laurasia. In the same period, South America and Africa separate, as well as Hindustan, which begins to rapidly move north. Today this is evidenced by the traces left by the Hindustan drift at the bottom of the Indian Ocean. Later, as a result of the movement of Africa counterclockwise, and Asia - in the opposite direction, the Tethys Sea disappeared.

On the basis of information about the geological evolution of the Earth, it is possible to make assumptions about its future structure. Geologists assume that the Atlantic Ocean will continue to expand, especially in its southern part, while the Pacific Ocean will shrink. Australia will move north and join the Eurasian Plate, while Asia and North America will join in the Aleutian Islands.

There is reason to believe that the Red Sea, one of the most active seismic zones, will continue to expand, Africa will shift to the north, and the future ocean will arise in place of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. This is also evidenced by the data of geophysical measurements, showing that today the African and Indian plates are moving away from each other at a rate of about 2 cm per year. In addition, the temperature and salinity in the deep waters of the Red Sea reach extraordinary values \u200b\u200b- 64.8 ° C and 313% o, that is, ten times higher than normal. This anomaly is explained by the rise of molten earth masses through cracks in the earth's crust.

But enough about the geological future of the Earth. Let's go back to her past. Obviously, the theory of neomobilism does not allow to prove the existence of Atlantis, because the movement of the plates is extremely slow. It remains to turn to the theory of oceanization of the earth's crust.

The location of the continents by the end of the Cretaceous period - 65 million years ago.

In contrast to the theory of neomobilism, the theory of oceanization suggests that the oceans were formed due to the vertical movement of the earth's crust. The continents themselves are horizontally immobile, and the thick continental crust can, under certain conditions, sink into the liquid asthenosphere. This is due to local overheating of the asthenosphere, a decrease in its density and an increase in its mobility. In this case, after the subsidence of the continental crust, part of it melts in the asthenosphere and it becomes thinner, forming the oceanic type of the earth's crust.

And yet, when did the subsidence of the earth's crust occur? By answering this question, we can find the answer to the disappearance of Atlantis and many other surface areas of the Earth. Today it is generally accepted that the formation of the oceans proceeded quite quickly, and over large areas. But the last stage in the formation of the oceans took place tens of millions of years in the last phase of the geological history of the Earth - in the Cenozoic era. And Plato wrote about a catastrophe that happened about 10 thousand years ago (?).

Today, many experts on Atlantis believe that it was located in the interior of the Atlantic Ocean, and some even argue that its location coincides with the so-called Bermuda Triangle. Let's then consider a part of the shelf strip in the area of the Florida peninsula and the underwater Blake terrace, located at a depth of 800-1000 m under water. The data of seismic surveys and soundings carried out by the vessel "Glomar Challenger" confirm that the subsidence of the continental shelf began in the Cretaceous period about 100 million years ago and proceeded very slowly. Later, about 30–50 million years ago, the rate of subsidence began to increase.

All these are processes of the distant geological past. As for the "comparatively recent" sinking of Atlantis, it could have happened as a result of a belated stage in the process of ocean formation. And yet, if Atlantis existed, it was a large island, not a continent. Today, there is strong tectonic activity at the bottom of the ocean. So, for example, it is assumed that the rupture of the transatlantic cable in 1898 occurred precisely as a result of underwater earthquakes. During its repair, rocks were extracted, the formation of which, according to some scientists, is possible only when cooling on the surface of the earth. In this case, once these rocks were above the surface of the sea.

The attention of atlantologists was also attracted by the results obtained by measuring the ocean level with the help of artificial earth satellites. The first radar altimeter was installed aboard the American space laboratory Skylab. During the flight, more than one hundred and fifty series of measurements were taken from an orbit of 440 km. The results were unexpected. It turned out that in the area of the Blake Plateau there is a decrease in the ocean level by almost 4 m, and over the Puerto Rican Trench the ocean level drops to 15 m. The width of the derivation in the Puerto Rico region is about 100 km. The most interesting thing, however, is that these measurements in the topography of the ocean surface are closely related to the measurements of the bottom topography.

The surface of the ocean, although we are accustomed to consider it horizontal, has its own topography. For example, the difference between the ocean levels on both sides of the Gulf Stream is about 1 m per 100 km and persists along most of the North American coast. A direct consequence of this tilt is the speed at which the stream moves ... A simple arithmetic calculation shows that a delevelation of 15 m per 100 km will lead to the formation of currents that will be 15 times faster than the Gulf Stream! With a Gulf Stream speed of 1 m/s, this would mean that the Puerto Rican Anomaly would have a current speed of 15 m/s! But only the wind in the atmosphere blows at this speed, in the ocean it is ten times less.

The sea surface reaches its lowest point in the Puerto Rican Trench.

Skylab trajectory projection on June 4, 1973 (a); ocean level measured with a satellite altimeter (6); relief of the seabed under the satellite's trajectory (c).

Shortly after this discovery, some of the interpreters of the riddles of the Bermuda Triangle were inclined to explain the disappearance of ships by falling into "holes", in which the water rotates at a terrible speed and "sucks" them into the depths of the sea. Such an interpretation is completely untenable, since all these effects may not be associated with sea currents. According to many scientists, areas with a sharp increase in the depth of the ocean contain significant amounts of compacted earth masses. As a result, the earth's gravity in them is stronger, the water is compressed more, and therefore the sea level is lower. Calculations show that in the area of Puerto Rico the surface of the sea should not be horizontal at all. If it were horizontal, then in this case one would expect the appearance of giant whirlpools.

But let's, after all, listen to the assumption of gravitational anomalies, say some modern researchers of the Bermuda Triangle. Then the conclusion involuntarily suggests itself that the Bermuda Triangle and Atlantis are two sides of the same problem. An ancient civilization, for reasons unknown to us, disappeared under water, and its “high-energy” sources led to this compaction, or they still function to this day and are the cause of gravitational and electromagnetic phenomena in the area.

However, ocean surface anomalies are not an isolated phenomenon, characteristic only of the Puerto Rican Trench. Altimetry measurements show that east of Brazil, in the southern parts of the Atlantic Ocean, similar anomalies are also noted, which are associated with underwater peaks existing in these areas. Moreover, a close relationship between underwater peaks and the position of the ocean level has also been discovered over the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the Cape Verde Islands and in a number of other places in the World Ocean.

At the end of July 1979, in the Soviet weekly "Za rubezhom" I caught my eye the headline: "A new expedition in the area of the Bermuda Triangle is looking for traces of an ancient civilization." The message was reprinted from the Brussels Peppl. This information, among other things, said: “A joint French - Italian - American scientific expedition went to the region of the notorious Bermuda Triangle. The purpose of a new journey to this part of the World Ocean, which the rumor called the "Enchanted Sea", is an attempt to discover the remains of an ancient civilization that existed before the civilization of Maya and Ancient Egypt.

It was also said here that some of the most popular researchers of the mysteries of the Bermuda Triangle took part in the expedition: the Americans Manson Valentine - a biologist, paleontologist and archaeologist from Miami, Charles Berlitz - one of the largest propagandists of sensations about the Bermuda Triangle and unidentified flying objects, French archaeologist Jacques Maillol other.

In his book "Without a trace" C. Berlitz placed an image of a pyramid allegedly discovered at the bottom of the ocean.

Jacques Maillol believes that once this region of the Atlantic Ocean was land that went under water as a result of the melting of glaciers. Flying by plane over the Bahama Bank, Mayol saw "artificial changes in the relief" of the bottom, similar to those observed in Peru. Therefore, the main attention of the expedition will be given to the search for artificial structures on the ocean floor.

Recently, there have been many reports about the walls of ancient buildings discovered at the bottom of the ocean, former roads lined with huge stone blocks, and various other structures - “the work of human hands”. Their origin and very essence is still unclear, so most archaeologists have so far refrained from making any conclusions.

In early 1977, the echo sounders of a fishing boat registered on the ocean floor, somewhat away from Bermuda, an irregularity resembling a pyramid. This was the reason for Charles Berlitz to organize a special expedition. In his best-selling book Without a Trace, he describes this pyramid, located at a depth of about 400 m below the surface of the ocean, stating that the height of the pyramid is almost 150 m, the base is about 200 m, and the slope is the same as that of the pyramid of Cheops. One of its sides is longer than the others, but Berlitz believes that this is a consequence of the uneven deposition of sedimentary material. If underwater research shows that the pyramid was built of stone blocks, this will dispel doubts about its geometric correctness. And from here, according to the author, a bridge will be thrown connecting Ancient Egypt with the lands of Maya ...

But for now, this is all just another guess...

Pangea (gr.) - the whole Earth, Pantalas - the whole ocean.

Altimeter - a device for measuring height.

History of Atlantis: myths, conjectures, riddles and real facts

The civilization of Atlantis is a source of controversy

It is necessary to consider the problem of Atlantis in two aspects: from the point of view of the historical epic, and using a scientific approach. In the first case, one has to deal with the evidence base and materials, the existence of which is never disputed by anyone. The palm in this area belongs to the works of Plato. The ancient Greek philosopher mentioned the mighty state of antiquity in the dialogues Critias and Timaeus, which were compiled on the basis of the diaries of another prominent ancient Greek philosopher Solon, who was Plato's great-grandfather. With the light hand of Plato, the name of the ancient state appeared, and its inhabitants began to be called Atlanteans.

The inconsistency of many of the facts set forth in the works of Plato raised a number of questions for subsequent generations. The main secrets of Atlantis are as follows:

whether there is a high probability of the existence of an island of such a large size, traces of which are almost completely absent today;
what catastrophe that occurred in antiquity could lead to the instant death of a large state;
could there have existed in such ancient times a civilization with such a high level of development, which is attributed to the Atlanteans by ancient and modern researchers;
why today there are no real traces from the past, indicating the existence of Atlantis;
whether we are descendants of a highly developed culture of the Atlanteans.

How did the contemporaries of the ancient Greeks see Atlantis

Plato in his narratives is very fond of describing the improvement of the capital of the Atlanteans. The most interesting thing in this aspect is that the descriptions of the ancient Greek philosopher strongly resemble the descriptions of other ancient Greek cities found in other ancient sources. The described infrastructure, weapons, ships, religion and lifestyle of the inhabitants of Atlantis look like the height of human perfection and a model of well-being.

Secrets of Atlantis: myths and legends against real facts

Modern scientists do not have data on a major geological and tectonic catastrophe that befell the earth in antiquity. The biblical data about the global flood that befell the Earth and mankind take us to a completely different era. All information, events and facts that speak in favor of the existence of Atlantis in this part of the globe do not stand up to criticism, if you rely on the theory proposed by Plato.

Sparta and Athens are located 300-400 kilometers north of the islands of Thira and Crete, which are ideal for the location of the Atlantean state. The explosion of the volcano, which destroyed a mighty state in one night, destroyed the balance in the world that existed until that moment. The consequences of such a large-scale disaster affected the entire southern Europe, North Africa and the coast of the Middle East.

Hyperborea and Atlantis - ancient mythical states

Nicholas Roerich

Myth of Atlantis

Zelinsky, a professor at the University of Warsaw, in his interesting research on ancient myths, came to the conclusion that the heroes of these myths were not legendary figures at all, but real figures. Many other authors have come to the same conclusion, thus refuting the materialistic trend of the last century, which tried to portray everything heroic as mere abstract myths. So, the French scientist Senard tried to prove that the Buddha never existed and was nothing more than a solar myth, which was immediately refuted by archaeological finds. The same attempts were made to prove that Christ never existed, although we have evidence very close to His time. In addition, a slab with a Roman inscription was recently found in Syria - an edict against the first Christians, extremely close in time to the manifestation of Christ. In this struggle between those who know and those who deny, the boundary separating the entire world psychology is so clear. At the same time, it is extremely instructive to observe how all deniers are eventually defeated; those who defended Heroism, Truth, Great Reality, they find justification in reality itself.

The one who truly understood heroes and myths and who was temporarily considered a dreamer turned out to be the greatest realist, while the negative skeptic rightly took the place of the "dreamer" who believed either slander or a perverted source. So slowly but surely the wheel of evolution turns around, bringing with it the restoration of the forgotten truth.

Let us look back and notice how quickly and how easily mankind forgets even recent events and figures. More recently, such persons as Paracelsus or Thomas Vaughan were noted in encyclopedias as deceivers. But then some people, in whom justice was alive, took the trouble to get acquainted with their works and found, instead of publicized charlatans, deep scientists, whose discoveries brought much good to mankind. I remember how in childhood we were fascinated by Gaston Tissandier's book Martyrs of Science. Those who died as victims of burnt offerings, in torture, on the scaffold, are now recognized as great scholars. But false skepticism continues its underground work and, instead of the former martyrs, hastens to invent others, so that they, in turn, will also be honored with monuments and popular celebrations.

In recent years, some isolated actions have been noted in public directions that give hope that the harmful denial seems to be already being recognized and thus, hopefully, occupying a well-deserved dark corner.

People are beginning to yearn for biographies. But even in this, the skeptical whisperers do not want to give in. Shrugging their shoulders, they will say to you, "How can you be sure of the true motives that gave birth to the actions depicted in the biography?" Or: “How can you be sure that the events that colored the biographies of your heroes were not accidents?” Or: “Can you say that the biographer was sincere and impartial?”

Let us assume that these remarks may, to a certain extent, be grounded. Let us give some coloring of the biography of the personality of the biographer himself. But nevertheless, the archives of historical documents still convey to us many undoubted life milestones of reality. Even in the recent past, chronicles were considered as dubious documents that did not deserve serious attention. But archaeological and historical finds and documents contemporary with the chronicles show that they deserve much more respect than superficial minds believed until recently. Of course, let's hope that humanity now will not waste whole centuries for the correct illumination of outstanding phenomena.

Paying tribute to chronicles and biographies, humanity will learn to write them. It would be the greatest mistake to think that the concept of heroes is compatible only with the past. The synthesis of our Era crystallizes its heroes. It is permissible to hope that bonfires, prisons and executions will no longer be indispensable attributes of these great souls!

By establishing that the gods of antiquity were heroes imprinted in the memory of the people, we will strengthen ourselves in the consciousness that in our day individuality and personality control the rudder of humanity. By asserting the existence of such individuals, we will learn, following the example of our ancestors, to pass on the essence of their personality in a benevolent positive study to subsequent generations. Let us not forget that in the future these biographies will enter popular schools as Lights of Progress. Therefore, let us teach young people not only to read biographies, but also to be able to write them, or rather, to distinguish them - which of the manifestations of their contemporaries will go down in history.

Reading legends, youth will learn to dream. This is a great quality, for it fills the heart with the best, most powerful fires. With these fires of the heart, young people learn how to discern where the truth is. Truth is not known by calculations, only the language of the heart knows where the great Truth lives, which, in spite of everything, leads humanity to ascent. Aren't legends a garland of the best flowers? About the small, about the insignificant and miserable, mankind does not compose legends. Often, even in seemingly negative myths, there is respect for the potential of inner power. In any case, each legend contains something unusual. Does not this singularity lead the human spirit over the twilight of the mechanical standard? Evolution is not built by this machine standard. A legend that frees us from the overwhelming conditions of everyday routine, renews our thinking, allows us to plunge into new depths of knowledge, full of inexhaustible youthful enthusiasm.

Ask a great mathematician, a great physicist, a great physiologist, a great astronomer, can he dream? I do not mention artists, musicians, poets, because their whole being is built on the ability to dream. A great scientist, if he is really great and is not afraid of malevolent witnesses, will certainly confide in you how well he knows how to ascend with dreams. Like many of his discoveries, they are based not only on calculation, but precisely on a lofty life dream.

Yes, legends are not an abstraction, but reality itself. Truly, dreams are not signs of illiteracy, but the distinctions of refined souls. Therefore, let us in every possible way encourage in our youth the striving for inviting and creative tales, and together with the youth, remaining young, we will honor the dream as the leading and uplifting wings of our rebirth and improvement.

Aspiration, Hierarchy, Infinity, Beauty – only along these milestones do we undoubtedly move forward. We must apply the essence of our activity to life immediately. By paying tribute to the dream, we will not become "dreamers."

“Atlantis is supposed to be discovered, but not in the Atlantic, but in the Aegean,” was the title of an article in the Norfolk Ledger-Star of July 19, 1967. linked to Atlantis" appeared in the New York Times the same day. The articles are devoted to the discovery of the city of Minoa, buried under a 9-meter thickness of volcanic ash on the island of Tyra in the Aegean Sea. The excavations were supervised by Dr. James W. Mavor of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute and Emily Vermeuli, Professor of Art and Greek at Wellesley College. Mavor and Vermeuli connected their discovery with Atlantis, since evidence of the existence of a highly developed civilization, as well as its sudden and violent death, was found on the island ... Pay attention to both headings. The value of these messages was seen not only in the discovery of a practically preserved city that flourished about 1500 BC, but in its possible connection with the mythical Atlantis. This was the latest attempt to make the legend of Atlantis a reality by changing its location and time of existence.

The most ancient and known to us references to Atlantis are contained in Timaeus and Critias, two dialogues of Plato, which date back to the 5th century BC. BC Plato introduces information about Atlantis into a conversation between Solon and an Egyptian priest in Sais. It is spoken of as a large island in the Atlantic Ocean, which sank into the water as a result of a volcanic eruption about nine thousand years earlier.

Since the time of Plato, mostly in the last two hundred years, hundreds of books and articles have been written about Atlantis. Some have tried to prove that Plato's story of Atlantis is not only possible but probable. Others claimed that Atlantis was just a myth, or they considered it as a historical fact, but correlated it not with the Atlantic Ocean, but with other places and with a later time.

A significant proportion of the literature on Atlantis is the numerous works of esotericists of various kinds, as well as the chaotic production of eccentric personalities. The attention paid to the legend of Atlantis by pseudo-scientists and adherents of various cults was the reason why representatives of official science avoid even discussing this issue.

Several medieval authors mention this legendary land, probably the best known and most popular is Ignatius Donelly's Atlantis: The World Before the Flood. First published in 1882, it was corrected and edited by Egerton Sykes in 1949. None of the books published before or after it contains such a volume of geological, archaeological materials, information from legends and does not present so many simple, unsophisticated and eloquent arguments. confirming the legend of Atlantis.

Donelly's arguments are based largely on the obvious similarities between the culture of ancient Egypt and the cultures of the Indians of Central and South America. On both sides of the Atlantic, a 365-day calendar was used, the embalming of the dead was practiced, pyramids were erected, flood legends were preserved, etc. Donelly argues that both the ancient cultures, the Egyptian and the American Indian, were the offspring of Atlantis, and when it was destroyed, spread west and east. Donelly suggests that the heritage of Atlantis can explain the fact that the Basques of the Spanish Pyrenees differ in appearance and language from all their neighbors. (“The Basque language is the only non-Aryan language in Western Europe.” The Lincoln Library, vol. 1, p. 516). Also, the inhabitants of the Canary Islands bear little resemblance to any African people and had a custom of mummifying the dead. Donelly says that Spain, Portugal and the Canary Islands could be a likely refuge for settlers from the dying Atlantis. He compared the names of the cities of Asia Minor and those cities of Central America that already had names by the time the first European explorers appeared:

ASIA MINOR CENTRAL AMERICA

Chol Chol-ula

Colua Colua-can

Zuivana Zuivan

Cholina Colina

Zalissa Gzalisko

According to Donelly, it would be too bold to attribute such a similarity to a coincidence. He cited 626 references to sources. Despite the weaknesses that critics found in his argument - and he was accused of "building a mountain of assumptions on the molecules of facts" - this work was an amazing achievement. Donelly's arguments are interesting to read even today, so it would make sense, using modern methods, to do the work of separating fact from conjecture in his intriguing book.

Egerton Sykes, an Atlantean explorer who has probably the world's richest collection of Atlantis literature, claims that thousands of books and articles have been written on the subject since Plato's time. However, only a few authors have added anything significant to Donelly's arguments. For example, an article supporting the possibility of the existence of Atlantis appeared in the November 1948 Science Digest. Originally published in MIT's Technical Engineering News in June 1948, it again addresses Donelly's strongest arguments regarding the possibility of the existence and sinking of an island nation. The article discusses the presence at the bottom of the ocean of a relief close to continental, namely, mountains, valleys, plains with troughs and depressions, similar to the channels of rivers and lakes. Interestingly, a relatively small deformation of the earth's crust (amounting to 1/8000 of the earth's diameter) can lead to a large area of the ocean floor rising above the water level and submerging other parts of the land. Confirmations of such phenomena that occurred in the past are discussed in detail in the article. In 1898, the crew of a ship that was laying a submarine cable in the Azores region tried to find this cable, lost at a depth of about 3.7 km, with the help of "cats". The rugged rocky bottom of the ocean complicated the task, and the tool often had to be cleaned of adhering pieces of soil. I further quote from the article: “It was determined by microscopic examination that these pieces of soil are lava, which had a vitreous structure and, therefore, should have hardened under atmospheric conditions. (Lava that hardens under water has a crystalline structure.) Since over the past 15 thousand years the lava has significantly weathered, we can assume that at that time the surface covered by it was located above sea level. This is another recent confirmation of the existence of land in the Atlantic. An article by R. W. Kolbe in 1957 (“Science”, vol. 126.) reports on studies of a deep-sea core recovered from a depth of 3.7 km in one of the sections of the underwater Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Findings of exclusively freshwater diatoms in sediment samples confirm that the studied section of the ridge was above sea level.

O. Mellis in 1958, studying the origin of deep-sea sands in the Atlantic Ocean, showed that the sands of the Romanch Basin probably resulted from the weathering of a section of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, which once rose above the surface of the ocean.

In 1959, the Military Engineer reported that “in the process of hydrographic surveys by the US Coast and Geodetic Survey, flooded depressions more than 90 m wide and up to 150 m deep were discovered in the Strait of Florida. They are located 25 km from the Florida Keys, where the ocean depth is 270 m. It is believed that they were freshwater lakes in the territory, which then sank.

The most important expert arguments in favor of the existence of Atlantis can be found in the article by René Malais "Investigations of the ocean floor in connection with the geological structure", which appeared in "Geologiska Foreningens" in "Stockholm Forhandlingar" (March-April, 1957). Malais argues that many of the continental-type landforms of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, in particular the canyons on the ocean floor, could not have been cut by underwater turbulent currents, but must have formed when the modern sea floor was above water level. He considers ocean currents and their impact on the glacier that covered Europe and America 10-12 thousand years ago. His article also includes drawings comparing flint points found in Sandia Cave, New Mexico, with Solutrean tools from Morocco and France. The similarity of these finds testifies to the unity of their origin. Since the time of their origin is estimated at 25,000 years ago, Malais believes that their owners could have spread west and east from Atlantis.

However, all these facts cannot serve as confirmation of the existence of Atlantis. At best, they indicate that sections of the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean in the recent past were located above the water level.

From time to time, newspapers and magazines publish articles or statements citing opinions of authorities both in support and against the legend of Atlantis. For example, "San Jose Mercury" July 17, 1958 quoted the Soviet physicist and mathematician Professor N. Ledner, who stated that he had studied the legends of Atlantis for 20 years and was convinced that ancient historical documents and cultural structures, together with the latest scientific discoveries, show that such an island continent actually existed. However, despite the efforts of authors such as Donelly, Malays, and others to collect and link together archaeological, geological, and mythological evidence to support the legend of Atlantis, there is no scientific evidence for the existence of Atlantis. There are no undoubted remnants of its culture and inhabitants. The myths and legends of the past, along with Plato's story, live to remind humanity of an ancient era. Some credible evidence is able to offer judgments like "it could have been." But no evidence has been found that allows us to say with certainty: "it was." However, this does not mean that such facts will never be found. But for now, Atlantis seems to remain a myth in scientific circles.

What is on the back of the coin? Is there scientific evidence that Atlantis never existed? Of course, the strongest argument against Atlantis is the lack of clear evidence of its existence. Most geologists agree with the concept of uniformitarianism, which assumes relatively slow change. They do not believe that any catastrophic events that could lead to the subsidence of the continent took place in the recent past, in the last 10-20 thousand years. There is evidence of certain, probably abrupt, climatic shifts between 11,000 and 13,000 years ago, but reputable scientists do not agree to associate them with earth movements. The uniformitarian stance is well expressed by Elizabeth Chesley Baty in her very interesting book America Before Man. Referring to the legend of Atlantis, she says: “It is not surprising that so little satisfactory evidence has been found, since Atlantis, if it existed at all, disappeared long before human memory could attest to it. At the normal speed of the earth's crust, it takes millions of years for such a large island to sink into the depths of the sea."

You only need to read the chapter on Atlantis and Lemuria in Martin Gardner's In the Name of Science (in the cheap edition called Quirks and Errors) to understand why most scientists dismiss this topic. The said chapter is full of vicious, sarcastic comments about the theory of Atlantis and to those who wrote about it. Gardner's main arguments against the existence of Atlantis boil down to the fact that there is no real geological and archaeological evidence to the contrary. E. Bjorkman in his book "In Search of Atlantis" draws material from the Bible, the Odyssey and the works of the Greek historian Herodotus, trying to connect the idea of Atlantis with an ancient Spanish or Portuguese city. L. Sprague de Camp and Willy Ley in the book “The Lands Beyond” question the very authority of Plato, using the opinions of his contemporaries, and being unable to draw a positive conclusion, they end the section with the following statement: “What did Plato mean when he said about the Atlantic Ocean and the continent beyond, remains not entirely clear to this day. Even scientists with a broad outlook feel the need to demote Atlantis into the category of myths.

The spring 1936 edition of The American Scholar featured an article by E. D. Merrill, Curator of the Botanical Collection at Harvard University entitled "The Drowned Atlantis and Mu" in which the author attempts to deny the possibility of the existence of Atlantis using scientific arguments and seeks to show that there is no philological connection between the languages of the Americas and the Mediterranean region, and that there are no common cultivated plants and domestic animals in Mexico and the Mediterranean. The theme of his discussion is the similar development of agriculture in America and the Old World, but based on different types of plants: most of the cereals, as well as vegetables and fruits of the temperate zone, are of Eurasian origin, while most of the American species come from the tropics and subtropics. He gives an impressive list of Old World and New World fruits and vegetables, respectively; claims that man came to America from Asia and that the highly developed civilizations of Central and South America developed without the influence of Atlantis and without communication with Europe and Asia. Merrill believes that no common cultivated plant or domestic animal other than the dog existed before 1492. This point of view about the absence of ties between Europe and America before Columbus is shared, however, not by all scientists.

T. S. Ferguson, archaeologist and writer, in his book One Paddock and One Shepherd, builds an impressive series of facts that demonstrate the similarities between the cultures of the Middle East and Central America. The illustrations comparing seals, pottery ornamentation and architecture are convincing. In addition, he gives a list of 298 objects of general culture. It can be assumed that ideas and constructions of a similar and even identical nature arose independently of each other in different parts of the world, but when you read this extensive list of objects and practices common to the Old and New Worlds, the possibility of all this independently arising on both hemispheres seems very unlikely. . Us. Books 22 and 23 contain an image of a seal unearthed at Chiapa de Corzo in Mexico. Ferguson further cites a letter from Dr. Albright of Johns Hopkins (University of Marilino, Baltimore, founded 1876 - Ed.), which states that "the seal contains several distinctly recognizable Egyptian hieroglyphs." Us. 49-52 Dr. George F. Carter, also of Johns Hopkins, is quoted: “Some plants undoubtedly existed in the Old and New Worlds in pre-Columbian times. There is a huge list of plants, most of them from the territories of Central America and Southeast Asia, which make up a full range of possibly to very likely translocated with human culture. The long-existing doctrine of the absolute separation of agriculture in the Old and New Worlds has no strong positions today. The botanical evidence should be reviewed without prejudice.”

Such statements, although they do not confirm the existence of Atlantis, nevertheless, indicate that there are certain ambiguities in the ideas of scientists about the origin of developed civilizations in South and Central America, divergences on the issue of the early stages of plant cultivation. The modern point of view is set forth in W.C. Bennett's beautifully illustrated Ancient Andean Arts, a publication sponsored by the Museum of Modern Art in New York, the Minneapolis Institute of Art, and the California Legion of Honor. Bennett comments on the situation: “The problem of the migration of the earliest inhabitants of South America is fascinating and intricate, but hardly more than the problem of the origin of advanced civilizations in the Andes. This includes the question of the introduction of plants into cultivation, and it is as far from being resolved as the question of where the plants of the New World were first cultivated.

In the April 1949 issue of Science Digest, another scientist, Dr. Maurice Ewing of Columbia University, published a short article entitled "The Lost Continent Called a Myth." Ewing, in his words, "since 1935 has been mapping, sampling, echo sounding the ocean floor and descending into the depths himself." He took underwater photographs down to a depth of 5.5 km and "found no evidence of sunken cities anywhere." His research focused on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, which stretches from Iceland to Antarctica. At first glance, this may be taken as evidence against the existence of Atlantis, but some reflection leads to a different conclusion. Let us suppose that the United States of America is destroyed by strong earthquakes and volcanoes in a few months or years. Our cities are reduced to rubble and then buried under deposits of ash and lava. Huge tidal waves crashed onto the earth, sweeping and destroying the remains of structures and all evidence of human creations. Finally, an entire country sinks into the ocean, and over the course of 13,000 years, tidal currents dissipate, and oceanic sediments cover all the remnants of our civilization. In 14967, someone will photograph a few tens of square centimeters of the ocean floor or drill a hole 10 cm deep at the bottom. Is it possible to assume that he will see cities or the inside of a car, plane or factory? Everything speaks against it. But he will not doubt that he has the right to conclude that America never existed.

The October 1953 issue of the Atlantic Monthly featured an article by Robert Graves entitled "What Happened to Atlantis?" Graves drew attention to Greek myths and tried to show that the myth of Atlantis arose as a result of mixing different events - the flood of Libya with the splendor of civilization on the island of Crete and its end. He says that the Cretans turned Pharos - a small island near the mouth of the Nile - into a port, one of the wonders of the world. The dramatic sinking into the sea of this island shortly after the destruction of Knossos, the chief city of the Minoan culture in Crete, was combined in legend with the legend of the flood at Lake Tritonis, which brought disaster to the people of Libya. (Once this lake was a vast inland sea, now it has turned into the Marets salt marshes). These stories were passed on to the descendants by the priests of Sais through Solon, who, embellishing the legends, thus formed our idea of Atlantis. However, the dating of the events that Graves speaks of is so much younger than the time of the Atlantis catastrophe described by Plato that after reading the article one gets the feeling that all this may be interesting, but there are no less fabrications in it than in some of Donelly's arguments.

One of the last speeches against the possibility of the existence of a mainland in the center of the Atlantic appeared on October 21, 1961 in the issue of the Saturday Evening Post. In an article entitled "Expansion of the Ocean Floor", Dr. Robert S. Dietz develops a theory of the structure of the earth's crust and the expansion of the ocean floor, which, according to him, seems incompatible with the existence of Atlantis. If, as he says, the continents move relative to each other by about 2.5 cm per year, then over the past 10 or 15 thousand years this will amount to too small changes. Dr. Dietz is a respected oceanographer, but his theory may be only partly correct. If we assume the existence of catastrophic events on Earth, then on the scale of the earth's history there will always be enough time for one or two continents to slip into the ocean.

In the end, we seem to be going in circles. The harder you try to solve the problem, the clearer it becomes impossible to do so. The current literature does not provide conclusive evidence for either viewpoint or the other. Until other than Platonic written sources are found for its history, or until there is strong evidence that it never existed, Atlantis is likely to remain a mystery.

How is the legend of Atlantis related to Edgar Cayce's Life Readings? If evidence of the existence of Atlantis is never found, Casey will be in an unenviable position. If the correctness of his notes is confirmed, he can become as famous an archaeologist or historian as he was a clairvoyant diagnostician in the field of medicine.

2500 "readings" are documented, given to approximately 1600 people. About 700 of them - almost half of those who received information about their past lives - had incarnations in Atlantis that affect their present life. Moreover, Casey did not mention all the incarnations of each individuality, but only those that most influenced his current life, as well as those that could be most useful to a person. Therefore, there is nothing impossible in the fact that almost everyone living today had incarnations in Atlantis at one time or another.

The marvelous property of this particular trend in "life readings" is their internal coherence. Although the "readings" were given to hundreds of people over the course of 21 years (from 1923 to 1944), they can be collected in a series of related, non-contradictory events. Individual abilities and weaknesses are reflected in the following lives. When many entities that lived together at the same time are reincarnated again in a different era, group or national tendencies become apparent.

According to the "readings" of Edgar Cayce, many individual souls who had one or more reincarnations in Atlantis are reincarnating on Earth in this age, especially in America. Together with the ability to technology, they carry with them a tendency to extremism. They often exhibit individual and group karma, marked by selfishness and exploitative tendencies, as far as relationships with other people are concerned. Many of them lived during the destruction or geological cataclysms in Atlantis. If Cayce's prophecies are correct, then a similar period of earth changes is imminent.

Unfortunately, few questions were asked about the time of the events, and this information was rarely given without questions. Only a few "readings" give specific dates for incidents in Atlantis. However, by comparing names and events in dated and undated cases, we arrive at a picture, perhaps vague and incomplete in places, extending far into the distant past beyond recorded human history. Instead of the collapse of the mainland in one day, as follows from Plato's story, we got the impression of human activity on the continent being destroyed during at least three major cataclysms, significantly separated in time.

There is a statement that we should consider especially carefully: land areas have undergone many changes - subsidence, uplift and subsidence again - and millions of years have passed between the first of these and modern times. There is evidence of disturbances (for the mainland of Atlantis - Ed.) about 50,000 years BC. Another shift probably took place around 28,000 BC, during which the mainland was broken up into islands. The final death of the remaining islands took place about 10,000 years BC. I think that it was this last catastrophe that Plato described in his writings. Each period of destruction lasted for, most likely, not days, but months or years. In any case, there were significant warnings, so that many of the inhabitants were saved by moving to Europe, Africa and America. Thus, according to Cayce's "readings", both the Americas and some parts of Europe experienced an influx of Atlanteans more than once in the prehistoric past.

Why does Edgar Cayce claim that incarnations in Atlantis have such a great influence on people, especially in our time? He answers this question in a general "reading" done to prepare material for a lecture on Atlantis:

“If the fact of the reincarnation and existence of souls who once dwelt in such an environment (i.e., in Atlantis) is true, and now penetrates into the earthly sphere and dwells in individuals, then is it surprising if in the past they made such changes in affairs The lands that brought them self-destruction, and if they come now, they can cause many changes in the affairs of peoples and individuals ”(364 - 1).

When we look at people who seem to have once been citizens of a country strikingly similar to 20th century America, we can often see both personal and national vices. This is the first step to salvation, as shown in the parable of the prodigal son (Luke 15:11-32). The vices, when understood, can be corrected, and America can still be spared the fate that befell Atlantis. At the very least, individuals, such as Robert Dunbar, may be able to change and lead more creative than destructive lives. (The story about this man is presented in the 2nd chapter of this book. - Approx. ed.).

What kind of nonsense is all this? Is there any basis for such notions other than the imagination of Edgar Cayce? Let us first turn to the source of this information and then see if it is supported by the light of the latest discoveries. If this happens, then we can look into the future with the help of a clairvoyant consciousness and try to glimpse our changing destiny.